Lono Agreement

Our failure to enforce any right or provision of these Terms shall not be deemed a waiver of those rights. If any provision of these Terms is held by a court to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of these Terms shall remain in effect. These Terms represent the entire agreement between us with respect to our Service and supersede any prior agreements we may have between us with respect to the Service. Please read these terms and conditions („Terms and Conditions“) carefully before using the curseoflonoband.com-Website (the „Service“) operated by Submarine Cat Records („we“, „us“, „us“ or „unser“). We disagree with the complainant`s argument that the District Court found that the plaintiff had only „probable knowledge“ of the sentence for first-degree murder. The Court`s statement: „This shows probable knowledge of what the verdict of first-degree murder was“, when *633 is read with the other findings, is not the final conclusion reached by the Tribunal on the question of knowledge; it is merely a statement on the logical derivative made by the General Court in its explanatory memorandum procedure. The court found that the defendants (including the plaintiff) and the defense attorney met and concluded the Plea Bargain Agreement, indicating likely knowledge on the part of the plaintiff, and another finding that the plaintiff heard the judgment in an open court and waited so long to challenge it. These findings ultimately led the court to conclude that „the applicant knew about the mandatory sentence all the time.“ During the break, a Plea Bargain agreement was reached by all defendants[3] with the State. They expressly agree that such an offer of a product or service is not a legal offer that may have legal consequences. Kenneth LONO, petitioner, against STATE of Hawaii, calls for answers. Our Service may contain links to third party sites or services that are not owned or controlled by Submarine Cat Records. It is for the judge to judge, as factual, the credibility of witnesses, including the accused, and to clarify all factual issues; the factist may accept or refuse all or part of the testimonies. .

. .