The municipality may extend the term of the lease at the end of the term of this lease. . Since the lease lasted more than a year, it could only be renewed by a registered instrument executed by both the lessor and the lessee. In the absence of a registered instrument, the lease is considered a „month-to-month lease“. It is apparent from the language of section 107 of the Law applying that a lease of immovable property from one year to the next or for a period exceeding one year or the reservation of an annual rent may be made only by a registered instrument. In the absence of a registered instrument, it must be a monthly lease. 5) The registration of your contract can be carried out within a maximum period of 8 months with penalty. 2. The respondent, the owner of the premises, leased it to the complainant in 1961 as a monthly tenant.
On this occasion, an unreg recorded rental deed was executed, which is the. the circumstances of the case may invoke the clause in his unregistsed deed of rental. 9. There is another reason for the arrest than the aforementioned clause cannot be helped by. the duration of the above-mentioned rental agreement. In response to the respondent`s argument that the term cannot be taken into consideration, since the act is not a registered act, the applicant was asked to consider the act. 1. The deed of rental had to be declared compulsorily if the duration is 4 years, otherwise you will not have the protection of the rent control law. The concept that the tenant has an advantage over the landlord is then that the lease is registered, where the rental rights are legally created. ..
Come to this Court. The petitioner`s assertion is that an unregistsed deed of rental was executed by the father of the beneficial owner of the premises, who was leased to the petitioner with effect from June. 1, 1989 and that the son (true owner) executed, on 29 March 1990, a registered rental deed which entered into force on 1 June 1989. In the registered rental deed, it is clearly stated that the father during the ex. acted on behalf of the son (beneficial owner), which means that the father`s deed was ratified by the son as part of the registered tenancy deed.. . .